>>> This post has been updated: click here for the current version. <<<
Photo radar said the car was going more than 70 km/h over the limit.
But in court, the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the vehicle had been speeding, according to the justice of the peace. https://trib.al/Nj4Vzn1
Photo radar said the car was going more than 70 km/h over the limit. How the owner fought the charge — and won https://trib.al/Ul9BZob
An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyers shut it down - NPR https://www.npr.org/2023/01/25/1151435033/a-robot-was-scheduled-to-argue-in-court-then-came-the-jail-threats
A Toronto lawyer is taking the city to court over a rule that limits the speed of any vehicle to 20 km per hour, pointing out that expecting cyclists to conform to that speed despite varying terrain introduces new risks that make cycling less safe: http://ow.ly/kX5u50MxPwU.
UK PM may consider higher speed limits on motorways. https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/70mph-speed-limit-uk-motorways-7542444
Hit the nail on the head, as they say Ian. Safety isn’t the issue with the Vision Zero crowd; eliminating the private automobile is.
I can’t count the number of cyclists I encounter at night without lighting or reflective clothing and no helmet riding on a major street instead of a bike path. Cycle advocates never address such issues which is why their safety propaganda rings hollow. The recent sustainability report you referred to just adds a veneer of sophistication to their campaign and plays well in the media
This croup of narrow minded zealots aren’t going to go away, and motorists should be grateful that SENSE exists to provide rationality to this almost one sided debate.